When using gravity assist from a planet to change a spacecraft's orbit, it is not possible to put the spacecraft into any desired final orbit.
The spacecraft interacts with Jupiter in a manner similar to a small projectile hitting a larger one. The interaction is governed by the conservation of angular momentum and energy and as a result only certain paths are possible. Do the orbits the spacecraft in this example satisfy those restrictions?
As the spacecraft is lifted into a larger orbit, it gains energy and momentum. Those gains should equal to the loses of energy and momentum by Jupiter. Is that in the example here?
Semi-major axis AU | Eccentricity | Energy per mass (km/s)2 = MJ/kg | Angular Momentum per mass AU2/yr | |
Spacecraft Orbit to Jupiter | 3.50 | 0.67 | -126.7 | 8.727 |
Spacecraft Orbit past Jupiter | 11.16 | 0.714 | -39.8 | 14.274 |
Jupiter's Orbit | 5.20 | 0.0 | -85.3 | 14.328 |
If we calculate the value of Tisserand's Parameter for the orbits before and after the spacecraft's closest approach to Jupiter we can determine if our example satisfies Tisserand's Criteria.
- | a/aP | (1-e2) | Tisserand Parameter |
Before | 0.673 | 0.496 | 2.641 |
After | 2.153 | 0.551 | 2.643 |
We see that our example does satisfy the criteria within the accuracy of our calculations. In the example here, we arbitrarily selected a path of closest approach and took whatever resulting solar orbit it produced, since I was only wanted to show the principles of gravity assist. Tisserand's criteria is more useful than testing example orbits; it can be used to predict what approach to the planet is needed to get into a desired final orbit.
For more on the Tisserand Criteria see the Calculation of the Gravity Assist to Neptune